If a scholarship comes open from someone leaving, do you think the Gophers would consider giving a scholarship to Stephon Sharp instead of "banking it" for 2017?? I am not saying that it is what I prefer or do I think that the Gophers would prefer.. But, besides the tough assists-to-turnovers ratio(i know that is not fair as he was pressed into PG duty), his averages and percentages in the last 2 games would put him way ahead of most of our scholarship players.
He is scoring well, probably playing as good of defense as the higher rated freshman played earlier in the year, and the ball actually moves ok when he has been in the game. I think TALENT WISE, it would be better to have him stay as a walk-on so we could use the scholarship elsewhere, but if he plays well enough to earn a scholarship, I dont know if its the right thing to pass him over without offering, as a reward for his play.
SO, IF A SCHOLARSHIP BECOMES AVAILABLE, DO YOU THINK MINNESOTA OFFERS SHARP A SCHOLARSHIP IF HE CONTINUES TO PLAY WELL IN THE LAST FEW GAMES OF THE YEAR??? AS OPPOSED TO BANKING IT FOR 2017?
He is scoring well, probably playing as good of defense as the higher rated freshman played earlier in the year, and the ball actually moves ok when he has been in the game. I think TALENT WISE, it would be better to have him stay as a walk-on so we could use the scholarship elsewhere, but if he plays well enough to earn a scholarship, I dont know if its the right thing to pass him over without offering, as a reward for his play.
SO, IF A SCHOLARSHIP BECOMES AVAILABLE, DO YOU THINK MINNESOTA OFFERS SHARP A SCHOLARSHIP IF HE CONTINUES TO PLAY WELL IN THE LAST FEW GAMES OF THE YEAR??? AS OPPOSED TO BANKING IT FOR 2017?
