Delayed Homeristic Review of Indiana St. game/issues
- By fencejumpers
- Inside Gopher Nation
- 23 Replies
A warning in advance that some of my thoughts (after DVR review) may be through the maroon and gold goggles and not appreciated by the "realists", but felt like much of the concerns and criticism was a tad over the top. A couple thoughts on some of the issues:
1. Early pre-snap issues. One of my biggest concerns watching the game live was how in the world do we see three pre-snap penalties after focusing on cleaning up the self-inflicted wounds after bad first game in this area. Still not acceptable, but noticed on review that at least the first one was clearly caused by linebacker clapping hands (illegally) and Calhoun jumped. You could tell Leidner was certain it would be called on the defense. Not a total excuse, but hopefully refs are a little more vigilant on that issue. What was strange on the next two is that you can't even see anyone move/jump on tape, nor see the defense moving in response so they must have been very subtle twitches right before the snap. I'm not sure what he refs saw on those, but ironic that one of the first plays when ISU is on offense, that there is a clear movement by the center and Poock and others are going crazy calling for the flag, but somehow the refs decided not to be as picky on the other side of the ball. Curious if anyone saw the movement on 2nd and 3rd penalties.
2. Leidner. Not sure what anyone saw that would lead to any conclusions other than he had a great game. 66% completion which should have been 80% with 3-4 clear drops. He had some really good pre-snap reads and made some clutch throws on 3rd and long. He missed a couple, but I'm still waiting for anyone to locate a college qb who doesn't.
3. Defense in General. There were many concerns raised about the defense and how many yards/points were given up against ISU. I had only one slight concern that I will mention below, but overall believe that most of the points were driven by the nature of a huge lead. Keep in mind that the Gophers went into half-time with a 38-7 lead, and the 7 wouldn't have likely occurred but for a real fluky deflected pass that fell perfectly into the arms of a 2nd receiver that probably had run the wrong route. The Gophers extended the lead to 41-7 early in the 2nd half. Very tough to keep the same focus, effort, and discipline when you have that big of a lead. Also keep in mind that we started the game down 2 defensive starters in addition to our biggest impact player from game 1, and were fairly dominated that half. When ISU scored most of their 2nd half points, we were playing a mix of mostly 2nd and 3rd team players, with a sprinkling of 1st team players, and again with a huge lead. I am not concerned about the defense.
4. The young defensive backs. I agree with Nine that there was a significant drop-off from Hardin to Shenault (jumping over Buford obviously) and that weakens our defense. That being said, I'm not sure Shenault as a young, true sophomore, and Craighton as a red shirt freshmen played as bad as is being concluded on here. They both had a couple plays where the cushions were too large especially Shenault on the two TDs. They both also had moments where they were blanketing the WR in the area, and simply got beat by a very good back shoulder throw by the qb. The one 6-5 WR, who was built and apparently had a 36 vert., was a tough match-up and a good receiver.
As some have mentioned, our memories are collectively real short when we identify these young guys as being real bad in coverage when you think about 10 years or so. Or how about when a young Brock Vereen started out as a CB with little experience. He made some big mistakes, and yet turned into an NFL player. Craighton is in his first year of playing, and first year at CB. Let's pump the brakes a little on the personal attacks of these young players who may turn out to be real good down the road. That being said, I'm still crossing my fingers that Hardin did nothing seriously wrong as I prefer Shenault and Craighton as depth guys at this point.
5. Merrick and Richardson. These guys weren't criticized for their efforts, but worth special mention as they were totally dominant and can't wait to see Merrick get additional experience and blow up some lines down the road. He was double-teamed every play it seemed and was constantly in the qb's face. You can also add in S. Ekpe and Stelter (before pulled for precautionary reasons) as having solid games.
6. QB hits. Speaking of qb's face, I can't remember a two game stretch where our front seven has hit the qb so much during the course of the game. Give the two opposing qb's credit, they both played pretty well despite numerous huge hits against them, even when they weren't being sacked.
1. Early pre-snap issues. One of my biggest concerns watching the game live was how in the world do we see three pre-snap penalties after focusing on cleaning up the self-inflicted wounds after bad first game in this area. Still not acceptable, but noticed on review that at least the first one was clearly caused by linebacker clapping hands (illegally) and Calhoun jumped. You could tell Leidner was certain it would be called on the defense. Not a total excuse, but hopefully refs are a little more vigilant on that issue. What was strange on the next two is that you can't even see anyone move/jump on tape, nor see the defense moving in response so they must have been very subtle twitches right before the snap. I'm not sure what he refs saw on those, but ironic that one of the first plays when ISU is on offense, that there is a clear movement by the center and Poock and others are going crazy calling for the flag, but somehow the refs decided not to be as picky on the other side of the ball. Curious if anyone saw the movement on 2nd and 3rd penalties.
2. Leidner. Not sure what anyone saw that would lead to any conclusions other than he had a great game. 66% completion which should have been 80% with 3-4 clear drops. He had some really good pre-snap reads and made some clutch throws on 3rd and long. He missed a couple, but I'm still waiting for anyone to locate a college qb who doesn't.
3. Defense in General. There were many concerns raised about the defense and how many yards/points were given up against ISU. I had only one slight concern that I will mention below, but overall believe that most of the points were driven by the nature of a huge lead. Keep in mind that the Gophers went into half-time with a 38-7 lead, and the 7 wouldn't have likely occurred but for a real fluky deflected pass that fell perfectly into the arms of a 2nd receiver that probably had run the wrong route. The Gophers extended the lead to 41-7 early in the 2nd half. Very tough to keep the same focus, effort, and discipline when you have that big of a lead. Also keep in mind that we started the game down 2 defensive starters in addition to our biggest impact player from game 1, and were fairly dominated that half. When ISU scored most of their 2nd half points, we were playing a mix of mostly 2nd and 3rd team players, with a sprinkling of 1st team players, and again with a huge lead. I am not concerned about the defense.
4. The young defensive backs. I agree with Nine that there was a significant drop-off from Hardin to Shenault (jumping over Buford obviously) and that weakens our defense. That being said, I'm not sure Shenault as a young, true sophomore, and Craighton as a red shirt freshmen played as bad as is being concluded on here. They both had a couple plays where the cushions were too large especially Shenault on the two TDs. They both also had moments where they were blanketing the WR in the area, and simply got beat by a very good back shoulder throw by the qb. The one 6-5 WR, who was built and apparently had a 36 vert., was a tough match-up and a good receiver.
As some have mentioned, our memories are collectively real short when we identify these young guys as being real bad in coverage when you think about 10 years or so. Or how about when a young Brock Vereen started out as a CB with little experience. He made some big mistakes, and yet turned into an NFL player. Craighton is in his first year of playing, and first year at CB. Let's pump the brakes a little on the personal attacks of these young players who may turn out to be real good down the road. That being said, I'm still crossing my fingers that Hardin did nothing seriously wrong as I prefer Shenault and Craighton as depth guys at this point.
5. Merrick and Richardson. These guys weren't criticized for their efforts, but worth special mention as they were totally dominant and can't wait to see Merrick get additional experience and blow up some lines down the road. He was double-teamed every play it seemed and was constantly in the qb's face. You can also add in S. Ekpe and Stelter (before pulled for precautionary reasons) as having solid games.
6. QB hits. Speaking of qb's face, I can't remember a two game stretch where our front seven has hit the qb so much during the course of the game. Give the two opposing qb's credit, they both played pretty well despite numerous huge hits against them, even when they weren't being sacked.