https://www.washingtonpost.com/inve...b0774c1eaa5_story.html?utm_term=.3520fb5770c4
'By Craig Whitlock and Bob Woodward December 5 at 6:47 PM
Pentagon buries internal study documenting billions of dollars in waste
Play Video1:05
The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste, according to findings by The Washington Post.(Victoria Walker/The Washington Post)
The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste in its business operations amid fears Congress would use the findings as an excuse to slash the defense budget, according to interviews and confidential memos obtained by The Washington Post.
Pentagon leaders had requested the study to help make their enormous back-office bureaucracy more efficient and reinvest any savings in combat power. But after the project documented far more wasteful spending than expected, senior defense officials moved swiftly to kill it by discrediting and suppressing the results.
The report, issued in January 2015, identified “a clear path” for the Defense Department to save $125 billion over five years. The plan would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel. Instead, it would have streamlined the bureaucracy through attrition and early retirements, curtailed high-priced contractors and made better use of information technology.'
'By Craig Whitlock and Bob Woodward December 5 at 6:47 PM
Pentagon buries internal study documenting billions of dollars in waste
Play Video1:05
The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste, according to findings by The Washington Post.(Victoria Walker/The Washington Post)
The Pentagon has buried an internal study that exposed $125 billion in administrative waste in its business operations amid fears Congress would use the findings as an excuse to slash the defense budget, according to interviews and confidential memos obtained by The Washington Post.
Pentagon leaders had requested the study to help make their enormous back-office bureaucracy more efficient and reinvest any savings in combat power. But after the project documented far more wasteful spending than expected, senior defense officials moved swiftly to kill it by discrediting and suppressing the results.
The report, issued in January 2015, identified “a clear path” for the Defense Department to save $125 billion over five years. The plan would not have required layoffs of civil servants or reductions in military personnel. Instead, it would have streamlined the bureaucracy through attrition and early retirements, curtailed high-priced contractors and made better use of information technology.'
