I just ran through the Summary of the two external reviews and saw nothing of great consequence in the findings. There were no other major issues with AD Teague (although a number of "locker room" type talk & alcohol use is noted). The look into sexual problems with athletes also reported little new.
Remember this is a quick take of the Summary only -- the report goes for 700+ pages. Recommendations follow:
The Report contains a
number of
recommendations in the following areas for the University’s
consideration:
∑
Training and Resources for Addressing Sexual Harassment within the Athletics
Department;
∑
Reporting and Handling of Allegations of Sexual Harassment within the
Athletics Department
;
∑
Monitoring and
Auditing of Sexual Harassment within the Athletics
Department;
∑
University Policies Relating to Sexual Harassment within the Athletics
Department; and
∑
Hiring and Vetting of Athletic Directors
Remember this is a quick take of the Summary only -- the report goes for 700+ pages. Recommendations follow:
The Report contains a
number of
recommendations in the following areas for the University’s
consideration:
∑
Training and Resources for Addressing Sexual Harassment within the Athletics
Department;
∑
Reporting and Handling of Allegations of Sexual Harassment within the
Athletics Department
;
∑
Monitoring and
Auditing of Sexual Harassment within the Athletics
Department;
∑
University Policies Relating to Sexual Harassment within the Athletics
Department; and
∑
Hiring and Vetting of Athletic Directors
